<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Masked Installer - Still in Love with Automation</title>
		<description>Comments for The Masked Installer - Still in Love with Automation at http://www.automatedhome.co.uk , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:21:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/The-Masked-Installer-Still-in-Love-with-Automation.html#comment-451</link>
			<description>&gt;fed up with the losses they were making on jobs that used HDMI distribution ... 

interesting - is that because HDMI is flawed, because the Sky box is flawed, or because the matrix switcher / baluns are flawed - or just the whole lot ! ??

 - CJ-UK</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 07:46:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/The-Masked-Installer-Still-in-Love-with-Automation.html#comment-414</link>
			<description>&quot;We’ll continue to use component video distribution and we’ll capture the HDMI output near the HDMI port and that’s all I’m saying about that&quot;  OH yes, on the verge of sending the 4 x 4 HDMI matrix switcher and HDMI over CAT5 balluns back and putting a Component matrix in, on the basis that it has to be cheaper than the labour costs of getting what's there working! 

At a recent training session everyone in the room was fed up with the losses they were making on jobs that used HDMI distribution. Recently went back to a job with a component switcher and fitted a new Sky box with the little 'HD thingy' on the back and it just worked.... Hey - Profit!

Long live good old analogue!! - Nick G</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:17:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/The-Masked-Installer-Still-in-Love-with-Automation.html#comment-413</link>
			<description>IMO, this series is really good - really useful for the practical insights it gives ... 

 - CJ-UK</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:44:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/The-Masked-Installer-Still-in-Love-with-Automation.html#comment-411</link>
			<description>Have to say after having Sky out 6 times - they finally replaced it with the new samsung hd box - bingo problems all resolved.

 - Chris Bond</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:26:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/The-Masked-Installer-Still-in-Love-with-Automation.html#comment-409</link>
			<description>HoHoHo! - couldn't agree more about the unreliability of the Sky+HD boxes! - they are *APPALLING* - I couldn't begin to list all the myriad things that are wrong with them (and yes, I DID used to have a TiVo). I'm just waiting for my two boxes to fail completely (as I know they will), at which point I'm going to replace them both with non-sky replacements, - probably 1 Freesat &amp; 1 Virgin Media V+ box. I've been a Sky customer for at least 15 years and *nothing* has done more in all that time to p1ss me off with Sky more than these crappy +HD boxes... - Paul G</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:46:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

