<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Just Add Power's HDMI Over IP Solution Explained</title>
		<description>Comments for Just Add Power's HDMI Over IP Solution Explained at http://www.automatedhome.co.uk , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:31:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/Just-Add-Power-s-HDMI-Over-IP-Solution-Explained.html#comment-727</link>
			<description>There is no detectable latency with  the Just Add Power HDMI over IP devices - they have been demonstrated to be suitable for playing interactive video games (Xbox and PS3) with the console in one location and the screen(s) elsewhere on the LAN.

 - Ed Qualls</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:28:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/Just-Add-Power-s-HDMI-Over-IP-Solution-Explained.html#comment-681</link>
			<description>whats the latency in encode to decode?  i want to use this in realtime

 - realtime user</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:18:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/Just-Add-Power-s-HDMI-Over-IP-Solution-Explained.html#comment-654</link>
			<description>Pretty cool.  
But it looks like it gets a bit complicated if you want to add more than one transmitter. Some form of simple switching in the receiver so you can access transmitter 1 or transmitter 2 etc would have been a good idea. or maybe they are saving that for the next release.
  - Stephen</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:48:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Announcements/Just-Add-Power-s-HDMI-Over-IP-Solution-Explained.html#comment-653</link>
			<description>great, looks to be the best way to do it ... the fully digital way, I guess ... at the moment, costs seem to be a bit high (a quick Google indicates a bit over 200GBP for a receiver, a bit under 300GBP for a transmitter) - but it certainly would make good use of all the Cat-5 we're all running through our houses ! - CJ-UK</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:42:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

