Following on from my thoughts in this thread I've been googling and found a couple of older threads on this forum -
This one and this one
The criticisms mainly seem to be around the reliance on a live bus signal (rather than having distributed 'smarts' in individual switches/relays etc). That would seem to be a valid criticism for the Loxone system in general however, rather than being specific to use of DMX. Is there any further analysis anyone has done?
DMX by itself isn't a solution of course - you need something to control it - but using Loxone for intelligence and generic, low cost, DMX switches and dimmers looks like it would be very cost effective
This one and this one
The criticisms mainly seem to be around the reliance on a live bus signal (rather than having distributed 'smarts' in individual switches/relays etc). That would seem to be a valid criticism for the Loxone system in general however, rather than being specific to use of DMX. Is there any further analysis anyone has done?
DMX by itself isn't a solution of course - you need something to control it - but using Loxone for intelligence and generic, low cost, DMX switches and dimmers looks like it would be very cost effective
Comment