Well, I took advice as given here and stuck with them. Sad to say the noises are still as obtrusive, still as noticeable and I still feel disappointed. I do not believe that a simple single gear (effectively two-cog) ratio within the TRV is the best that can be done in terms of noise reduction. I have read your post Rameses (and thanks very much for your input by the way) but having played with an HR92 both on and when detached (using finger to add resistance to the small primary cog) I still believe that the gearing decision was a compromise (of course) between noise level and cost to manufacture. I'd pay a lot more for a quiet TRV ;-) Change the ratio and extend the time taken to open and close the valves.....I wish that had been the way the decision had gone. But although I have an engineering background I do obviously concede that this is just conjecture from me!
Anyway I m clinging on to a final hope. In other posts you kind, helpful people asked me what type of valve body had been fitted to the majority of radiators. Well it's been hard but I think I've found the answer based on the number "43" embossed on the side. I think these are the valves:
http://www.intatec.co.uk/document/15...heet_-_r02.pdf
Does anyone know anything about these? They have a plastic thread. They actually do seem quite stiff to depress - although I'm not sure if that is a product of their mechanical construction or the pressure of the water in my system?
In addition to this, can anyone on this thread who has stated that their system is nice and quiet please help me out - it would be fantastic to know what valves you are using from which manufacturer and also what the model number is on your HR92s (I want to establish once and for all whether Honeywell do indeed have 'different models' of HR92s - some of which are quieter - Rameses can you help directly with this question?).
Thanks you very much in advance! I need to hush these things up!
Sentry1